









 |

New RPTV....4:3 or 16:9????
Posted by Cam Ens [IP: 199.185.225.204] on December 12, 1998 at 18:58:32:
In Reply to: New RPTV....4:3 or 16:9???? posted by Andy on December 12, 1998 at 16:54:12:
: In the end, i would base my decision : on which screen format am i likely : to use most. If it looks like the : total time you spend watching cable or : DSS type of 4:3 material will exceed : that of widescreen movies, I would go : for a 4:3. With a large enough 4:3 : you can have a letterboxed image as large as a lot of 16:9 er's, with the : added bonus of 4:3 programming being : much larger. As a long time laserdisc : viewer, i personally don't mind the : 'black-bars'. i think i would mind : gray or black bars on the sides of a 4:3 : image though. I think the new 4:3 Sony : XBR's have integral proprietary line- : doubling of some sort. So there are some : 4:3 TV builders who are addressing : the loss of vertical resolution in : letterboxing.: As far as 'fitting' the 4:3 to a 16:9 : with the set's own internal processing, : what I've seen is hokey at best. I think : you've got a choice of various degrees of stretching or cropping, not good IMO. : Even with a typical 16:9er you are not totally going to eliminate the 'black : bars' from your viewing. The only way : is with anamorphic ('enhanced for widescreen') DVDs of 1.85:1 aspect ratio. If it is a 2.35:1 anamorphic, : you will still end up with the dreaded : black bars, albeit much thinner ones. : Also, regular widescreen 1.85:1 DVD's : will also 'fit' a 16:9, but they are simply 'blown-up' to fit and have : no resolution advantage over the same : image letterboxed on a 4:3. : Another thing to consider is bang for : the buck, which would be higher with a 4:3. : Personally, as much as I'd like to upgrade, there seems to be too much happening as far as NTSC, DTV, and : 'cross-over' based sets to commit : to a new set now. Plus my 46" Sony : still performs like a champ, and : puts up a stunning picture...even in : 2.35:1 letterbox. But if i HAD : to buy something now, given my cable : LD and DVD viewing habits, it would be : a 53XBR200 4:3 Sony. : Good luck. Thanks for the excellent points Andy. I am currently looking very closely at the 53XBR200, and also the 61XBR200. They have a great picture, but of course aren't digital ready. But does that really matter right now? I guess its just personal opinion and hunch as to when HDTV will get serious and if the standards will continue to be what they are today. I have also considered the Hitachi SDX and Toshiba digital ready RPTV's as well. Once again, thanks for your input.
Follow Ups:


Return to the new SMR Forums Menu

Design
& HTML © SMR Home Theatre, Images © SMR Home Theatre cannot be reproduced without
permission. The images on this page are digitally watermarked. New forum
messages should be posted into SMR Forums v2 - http://www.smr-forums.com/

|
|