![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() ![]() |
Component vs. S-video output
Posted by Jonas A [IP: 130.244.107.130] on August 10, 1999 at 21:20:28 In Reply to: Component vs. S-video output posted by Ken Simmons on July 28, 1999 at 10:51:06: The component video may be "the most expensive system to implement", but only by the cost of an extra 10bit D/A-converter (Which is implemented anyway in most "better" DVD-players. Yes, it is better than Y/C, and the reason is simple. Once you combine the separate components of the videosignal you can't separate them completly again. The signal originates as a RGB-signal in the TV-camera or filmscanner, which immediatly is converted to Component Video (Y-Pr-Pb-format, aka Y-Cr-Cb, aka YUV, where Y is a B/W picture an Pr and Pb is the difference betwen B/W and red resp. blue,) video is usually edited and sometimes stored in this format professionally. This conversion doesn't degrade the signal if the converter is of sufficient quality. In the TV the process is reversed. The less conversion stages the better! On the other hand those formats have different limitations in other aspects than vidoesignal, like timeing and most notably resolution. Thats why LD looks much better than VHS and Broadcast TV.
Follow Ups:
Return to the new SMR Forums Menu
|
|
|||
![]() © SMR Group 2001-2004 - http://www.smr-group.co.uk/ |
|||||