pioneer dvl-09, 909, 919, too new 4 review?

Posted by cletus [IP: 164.145.53.243] on June 07, 1999 at 07:16:08
Using Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; U):

In Reply to: pioneer dvl-09, 909, 919, too new 4 review? posted by Will Gatlin Jr. on June 06, 1999 at 00:18:43:

The DVL-91 also has 10-bit video. If the DVL-90 only had 8-bit video, then that's another difference between DVL-90 and DVL-91. I know their were a couple of things I didn't like about the DVL-90 (so I didn't consider it), but the only one I remember was the DTS support (also maybe the lack of component outputs, but I don't remember). The DVL-919 is perhaps close to the DVL-91 (an Elite) but a little bit later version since it has 24-bit DAC (vs. DVL-91's 20-bit).

Since I use externals DACs (DSP-A1 for DD and DTS and Parasound 1100 for CD and HDCD), the Pioneer's internal DAC doesn't matter to me. Yes, I agree, CDs sounds great through the Parasound. Even I (non-golden ear) can hear a difference between the DSP-A1's DAC and the Parasound's.

Follow Ups:

Return to the new SMR Forums Menu

Design & HTML © SMR Home Theatre, Images © SMR Home Theatre cannot be reproduced without permission.  The images on this page are digitally watermarked.  New forum messages should be posted into SMR Forums v2 - http://www.smr-forums.com/

	The Web   SMR Archive